PHYS 280 :: Physics Illinois :: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Electronic submission of RE4v1 due 1st April at 10 PM.
For RE4v1, you will write a report using the scenario and the guidelines described below. Your RE4v1 will be graded by your writing lab TA, who will use the following RE4 rubric.
Scenario
You are an intelligence analyst for the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), which brings together analysts and specialists from the CIA, FBI, DoD, and other federal agencies. With personnel changes arising from the transition between two presidential administrations, you are in charge of writing and disseminating a brief report that establishes a shared baseline for incoming staff. The January 2026 report from the Department of Homeland Security's Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office (CWMD), which documented over 1,000 operations, engagements, trainings, and exercises across 48 states and territories in Calendar Year 2025, underscores the ongoing urgency of this briefing. Your report should explain the NCTC's accepted definition of terrorism, the key distinctions between types of terrorism relevant to a nuclear context, and the principal avenues by which terrorist actors might seek to acquire nuclear-explosive materials or intact nuclear weapons. The report will serve as an introductory document to facilitate a more productive and informed discussion of nuclear terrorism threats among new Center personnel.
The body of your report should begin with a brief summary of the report's content and purpose, include an introduction that establishes the stakes and context of the issue for your specific audience, address all required content in a logical and well-organized sequence of sections, and conclude with a brief reflection on the broader significance of the issue for your audience. Unlike previous required essays, no further structural guidance will be given; determining the most logical and effective organization is part of the assignment, and RE4v0 is designed to help you work that out before you begin drafting.
Required Essay 4, Version 0 (RE4v0), due March 30th after the writing labs.
Produce a draft before your Writing Lab and finalize it in the WL. Electronic submission due at the end of the Writing Lab. No AI should be used for RE4v0.
In real technical writing, we are often not given much more direction than the prompt above. RE4v0 is meant to help you identify the tasks you need to complete before you begin drafting, as well as the important writing elements to consider, such as style choices. It is also the basis for determining how to structure the body of your RE4v1: the organization of your sections, the order of your arguments, and the genre conventions you will follow are all decisions you should work out here before you begin drafting. For RE4v0, write 2 to 3 bullet points that describe important aspects of each of the following categories:
- Coverage of issues and information
- Precise and accurate use of concepts
- Explanation and argument
- Professional style (including sources to be used)
- Conformity to conventions
Notice that these categories are the same categories that appear in the grading rubrics for RE1, RE2, and RE3. The purpose of RE4v0 is not only to develop the skills needed for prewriting but also to enable the creation of the RE4 grading rubric. Here is a template for RE4v0 that we encourage you to use.
To facilitate this prewriting task list, identify the following:at
- Course texts from which to pull information for your report.
- An appropriate report structure for a BLUF-format intelligence product- look at How to Write an Intelligence Product in the BLUF Format for an explanation of this style and an example. (This style guide is from Henley-Putnam University. "How to Write an Intelligence Product in the Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF) Format." Instructional Exercise. Featuring: National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC), "Prepaid Stored Value Cards: A Potential Alternative to Traditional Money Laundering Methods," Assessment Product No. 2006-R0803-001, October 31, 2006.)
- Key NCTC writing style and conventions to follow, including accuracy, brevity, and clarity standards described in the BLUF guide.
- Content necessary to meet the aims of this document, including definitions, typologies, acquisition pathways, and fissile material stocks.
RE4v0 is worth 5% of your RE4v1 grade.
In the Writing Lab on March 30th, you will finalize your rubric suggestions and discuss them with your classmates to collectively develop the assessment rubric. After receiving your suggestions, submitted as RE4v0, the course staff will compile the key aspects discussed into a formal collective rubric. You will use this rubric to guide your first draft and your peer response.
Here is the rubric suggestion submission template that you will use.
Required Essay 4, Version 1 (RE4v1)
Guidelines
- Base your report on the assigned course readings and the current (Spring 2026) class slides on Nuclear Terrorism. You will identify the relevant readings as part of RE4v0.
- Professional Genre Considerations
- You will be graded on the content and clarity of your report as well as your ability to conform to the writing style of your chosen genre; see the RE4 rubric and the NCTC Terrorist Threat Snapshot. This document is meant only as an example of format (i.e., section headers) and style.
- Assume your reader is a knowledgeable federal official who is new to the NCTC and needs clear, direct, and efficiently organized information. You do not need to define terms that have been defined in previous essays (e.g., RE2 or RE3) or provide citations for them. However, be sure to define all other technical terms. You do not need to place these definitions in quotation marks, but you do need to provide citations for them.
- Format
- Key terms should be in bold the first time you use them.
- Each section requires a brief section heading that is left-aligned, bolded, and 14-pt font.
- After the title, a brief (2 to 4 sentence) summary of the content of your report. Include a left-aligned, bolded "Summary" heading in 14-pt font to clearly indicate this section.
- A title that briefly describes the content of the report. The title should be centered, bolded, and 16-pt font.
- 1.25 to 1.5 pages in length, when printed in the format specified in the Phys 280 Style and Format Guide, including the title, headers, and footers.
- Citation of Sources
- Do not include a bibliography or a list of references
- Refer to the class slides as "26p280 Nuclear Terrorism, p. #" (e.g., "26p280 Nuclear Terrorism, p. 12") or "26p280 Nuclear Nonproliferation, p. #" as appropriate. Refer to other readings using the abbreviated format specified in the Phys 280 Style and Format Guide.
- Use footnotes for citations. Footnotes should be in Times New Roman, 10-pt font.
- Do not give citations for information that is common knowledge. In deciding what is common knowledge, consider what could be known by a typical University of Illinois student not enrolled in Phys 280. If in doubt, include a citation.
- Use only the sources you identified in RE4v0.
- Tips
- Do not forget to include the writer's memo for RE4v1, described below.
- Follow all of the specifications described in the Phys 280 Style and Format Guide.
- Optional background reading: Department of Homeland Security. (2026, January). CWMD 2025 Annual Statistics.
Required Procedure for the Use of AI Tools in this Assignment
For RE4, your AI tool will serve as a critical reviewer of your analysis. After writing your own complete draft, you will use the AI to stress-test your reasoning about acquisition pathways.
Write your own complete standalone draft (no AI use) of the report. This draft should reflect your best effort to conform to the genre conventions.
Provide your completed draft and the sources you used to your AI tool. Prompt it to critique your discussion of the possible pathways by which terrorist actors might seek to acquire fissile materials or a nuclear device, and to evaluate your choice of the highest-risk pathway.
Compare the AI's response to your own analysis. Write a paragraph explaining why you either accept or reject the AI's assessment, using specific evidence from your course readings and slides.
Using what you learned from this exchange, revise your draft where necessary.
Prepare the final version of RE4v1.
Note: the goal of this procedure is not to replace your own analysis with the AI's. It is to sharpen your reasoning by comparing your conclusions to an outside perspective and defending your choices with evidence. Your final report should be entirely your own.
All AI prompts and outputs, including your written comparison, must be included in the writer's memo.
AI Disclosure Statement
Discloses the use of AI in technical writing. The statement specifies the tool used and briefly describes how it was used. It includes a certification that the author takes responsibility for the verification of all facts and content.
Writer's Memo for RE4v1
Note: Writer's memos and AI disclosure statements do not count toward an assignment's length requirement.
For the RE4v1 writer's memo, please compose 3 to 5 questions for your peer review partner. These can address content, genre conformity, organization, or any aspect of the writing you are uncertain about. Please also include:
Your RE4v1 submission must include:
Submission must be in one file.
- Your complete standalone draft (Step 1) and your final RE4v1
- The AI's critique (Step 2) and your written comparison and response (Step 3)
- A complete log of all AI prompts and responses
- Brief answers to the following questions
- Did the AI make any factual or technical errors in its critique? If so, identify them.
- Was the AI's assessment of your highest-risk pathway genuinely different from yours, or did it largely agree? If it agreed, reflect on whether a stronger or more targeted prompt might have produced a more useful challenge.
- How did comparing your analysis to the AI's response deepen your understanding of the material?
- Where did this process reveal weaknesses in your original draft, and how did you address them in your final version?
Your RE4v1 submission must include:
- Your RE4v0
- Your RE4v1
- Your AI disclosure statement
- Your writer's memo for RE4v1
Submission must be in one file.
