The development of pressure controls is similar to those of the thermostats. However the pressure controls do not only alter the motion of the particles by modifying either the velocities or the accelerations but also vary the box size.
The first approach [2] used volume scaling exclusively. A method analogous
to the Berendsen thermostat has been devised where the system is coupled to
a pressure bath [3]. The instantaneous pressure
has to obey the equation [1]
Nosé accomplished this task again by introducing an additional degree of
freedom. In the general case not only the volume is allowed to change
but also the shape of the cell [14,15]. One can also
include the rotational degree of freedom for
molecules but here we are interested in monatomic systems only. Additionally
we restrict ourselves to cubic cells. The real coordinates are
scaled with respect to the volume , i.e.
The corresponding Hamiltonian becomes
As it has been pointed out [12] one is free to choose a
pair of variables from the set
--
-
where denotes the
volume
the strain rate and ,
the corresponding time derivatives. Specifically to describe
the evolution of volume with time either (Nosé and Andersen) or
can be used. Hoover decided to take the latter one. Again using
the transformations to eliminate the scaling
parameter described above he ended up with the following set of equations:
Now we are in the position to combine the Nosé-Hoover thermostat and pressure control to end up with a formulation that allows simulations in the isobaric-isothermal ensemble.